Home > Uncategorized > Puff Goes The Magic Flat Tax Dragon Dream

Puff Goes The Magic Flat Tax Dragon Dream

Someone of greater stature and fortune than myself once wrote that the only thing you can count on is death and taxes.

Two scribes, Dave Carpenter and Stephen Ohlemacher, were chastised for writing in the Huffington Post how the estimated $1.1 billion fortune of George Steinbrenner might escape inheritance tax to his heirs because of the timing of his death Tuesday. My colleague felt the timing of the article was rather crass.

I know the feeling. I wrote a column on the day Sen. Robert Byrd died, noting only that he was the king of pork barrel legislation. Crass, a friend said.

Steinbrenner’s fortune was timing. He died in a year of no inheritance tax for person’s whose estate is worth more than $3.5 million. It was pointed out that the New York Yankees owner, among many acquisitions, was worth about $1.1 billion.

That got me to thinking. The most creative writers on earth are U.S. politicians. The only ones more creative are the attorneys who find loopholes in the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

Being a group effort stretching over more than a century, the code makes short stories out of Leo Tolstoy’s “War and Peace” and “Anna Karenina” and John Updike’s Rabbit series.

I have several theories about taxes:

If something wiggles, tax it. When it stops wiggling, tax it one more time just to make sure it is dead.

Politicians determine in their infinite wisdom  — my favorite derisive expression for group think — what is best for the public good as if they really know. And then tax all for something that benefits few.

One of the reasons I loved Bill Clinton was that he recognized “tax” as the vilest of four-letter words. He simply changed the name to a 10-letter word: “Investment.”

Personally, I favor a flat tax on earned income and a national sales tax on all purchases. Let the states, counties and cities come up with their own devices.

The flat rate seems to range from 10% to 30% in (cringe) socialist states. The sales tax would range in the penny to nickel bracket.

The immediate impact of the Remmers legislation would throw millions of IRS employees and their satellite industries in the private sector out of work. Consider the number of attorneys in that crowd if it makes one feel better.

The good thing about this form of taxation is that it will define budget incomes and therefore have a direct bearing on spending — as long as the Fed doesn’t print money as it is prone to do. But that’s another wrinkle to be ironed out another day.

The incentive would be the same as today. The healthier the economy, the more income to Treasury.

All those political juices squeezed to find new taxes could be put to use figuring out new ways to produce jobs.

I’m told the big financial institutions are sitting on tons of equity that could produce jobs but they fear the impact of new taxes and regulations. The flat tax would clear one hurdle.

Speaking of regulations, wouldn’t it mean they would be more judiciously applied to prevent undo risk and promote safety for the benefit of the federal government and big business to make as much money as possible.

Excuse me. This was all a dream. I just awakened to the real world. The Democrats in Congress were attaching pet domestic spending projects to the military defense appropriations budget.



Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. libert
    July 15, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    Millions of IRS workers? Seriously? According to the Appendix this year’s proposed budget historical tables, the IRS employed 32,763 people in FY2009 (page 1043).

    However, I do agree with your assessment that “the healthier the economy, the more income to Treasury.” That’s why we should cut taxes and increase government spending to fill the massive output gap, as ARRA successfully did (even if it was too small, as most economists agree). Unfortunately, Democrats and Republicans alike (including Mr. Barack “Need to tighten our belt” Obama) have been publicly lambasting that idea as “fiscally irresponsible.” Contrary to those supposed fiscal hawks, I agree with you: we need another round of fiscal stimulus, or the economy will surely falter, producing even less revenue.

  2. July 15, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    The millions include those in the private sector, H&R Block, J.T. Harris, et.al. — JKR

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: